The main issue that was argued the last week of January was whether or not a female guard should be permitted to have contact with a detainee. Practical concerns were raised in regards to religion. With Islam, it is taboo to be touched by a female that a man is not related to or married to. Several witnesses were called, including the female guard at issue. Steps were taken to preserve her anonymity and there was no personally identifiable information that was given about her. She testified as to how her job required her to handle the detainee. Arguments were made that went to whether or not allowing females to touch detainees would hinder that females’ advancement in her career, whether or not the defendant’s religious views were being violated, whether or not suitable male replacements could easily be found, etc.
I think the real issue, that was never broached, is whether the commission actually has the jurisdiction to rule on this matter with regards to general handling while in custody down at Gitmo. This hinges on how broadly the court interprets the defense’s request for touching to cease. Defense tried to argue for all touching, period, to cease. The judge cannot rule on what happens outside of court related proceedings, and even then, how far does his authority reach? Does it apply to court related medical exams? Transfers from the detention facility to the court holding facilities prior to coming into the court room? Anything further is speculation and a ruling has not been handed down yet by the judge, but I will definitely be interested to see how this comes out.
(Margaret Baumgartner, Hadi al Iraqi Hearings, January 25-31, 2015)
Myself (Margaret Baumgartner) waiting to board the ferry across the base.
Now that I’ve made it home from GTMO, I am trying to process everything that I’ve learned. I did not have the time I wanted to sit down and really delve into posts. We were busy with hearings, sit downs, and other interactions, however, I was able to keep a journal. I jotted items down as I went and from these, I will pull my next several posts.
People Behind the Scenes
One thing I enjoy about travel is meeting new people. If you take the time to really listen, you can garner some fascinating information. We had a picnic table that we NGOs would congregate around at night. Various people involved in the process would join. Others would meet up with us at dinner. The base is very small and thus you start recognizing everyone. There are a lot of people that are very involved in the hearings.
On the ferry ride to our quarters at Camp Justice, I spent some time speaking with the three folks who handle the transcripts. They are responsible for making sure that the transcripts of the proceedings are done each day and available to the public on the website. I ran into them again at dinner that night. They have been involved since the beginning and make sure that the public is kept “in the know”. They often work late nights to make sure that the transcripts are available at the end of each day.
I also spent some time skipping rocks at a beach with a contractor responsible for the CCTV feed that is sent stateside. He really likes his job, takes pride in it, and is an integral part of making sure those stateside have access to the hearings.
Our drivers were really nice and willing to take any of us anywhere we needed to go. One was a fountain of knowledge about the base and he would find out answers if he did not have one. Most of our questions revolved around military life and what it was like to be deployed to GTMO. He also knew a lot about the history of the base. GTMO is more than just a place where detainees are kept. Families of deployed soldiers live there. There are recreational sports. It is like a little town. There’s even McDonalds, Subway, and Taco Bell along with several other places to get out and eat at.
GTMO housed Haitian refugees in the 90s. It was a place where Columbus landed in 1494. Teddy Roosevelt was by the base at one point in the Spanish American War. GTMO is a port for the Navy and the U.S. Coast Guard. Detainees are kept there because no one else wants them, those who do may raise concerns for National Security, and mostly because Congress does not want them stateside. Thus, GTMO has this horrible reputation when it was really one of the few places left to house those accused of terrorist acts while awaiting due process.
The old GTMO lighthouse.
One person commented to me that the detainees have it better than they (those stationed there) do in regards to living conditions. Would this be made known by the media or others reporting on it? Probably not. It doesn’t make for a good story. The soldiers down at GTMO are someone’s brother, sister, father, mother, and loved one. They are doing what their duty is and it really does sadden me when the collective whole receive a bad reputation for the acts of a few bad apples that are beyond their control.
I have noticed that everyone really does the best they can with what they are given and also the situation. Defense, Prosecution, Security, Judge, Staff, Contractors, Deployed Soldiers…..it doesn’t matter who they are, they are all working hard. I definitely gained a lot more respect for those involved in every aspect of the process on this trip.
(Margaret Baumgartner, Hadi al Iraqi Hearings, January 25-31, 2015)
I just received my DoD orders via e-mail today. Preparation for this trip has been a whirl-wind. I’m almost done meeting next week’s deadlines for work, since I will be out of the office (I should be careful, they might expect this type of productivity from me on a regular basis!). My state-side brother and I were talking logistics and he laughed at me for getting excited about the mess hall. I always have enjoyed the food in the messes and I think it annoyed my brother that I would insist on eating there when I would visit. In his words, the mess hall only has good food when a General visits. It’s a lucky week for me then, since there will be a General in camp!
Late night at the office, trying to get through some items in preparation for Sunday’s trip!
On Tuesday, I had breakfast with former rep (and fellow 2010 graduate) Hattie Harman. She highly recommended the book “The Terror Courts” by Jess Bravin. I plan to dig into that book before getting down to GTMO as it mentions several people who are involved in the proceedings. I hope this will give me a better sense of who I am talking to when I meet people. The book should also give me some talking points to pass time while we wait in the lines.
I have also started my refresher with “the Manual” in preparation and I also went to the GTMO website for information. I am not myself until I’ve had coffee in the morning (see my prior Fort Meade postings describing said addiction), so I was scouring the site for information of a rumored cafe. I will also have my own trusty stash, just in case.
On Friday, I will be attending Professor Edwards’ class as a guest to field questions, talk about the project, and meet other participants. That is the extent of my preparation outside of the mandatory paperwork to date, however, that will increase as Sunday approaches.
Me (Margaret Baumgartner) and one of my favorite members of our armed services.
Notification of Travel
Wow. I am thrilled to be a part of this opportunity. I think all of my co-workers are also just as excited to hear about the experience, as well as read about it, on this blog. In fact, one of my Dutch co-workers happened to stop by my office and he was very interested in hearing about this project in general. A word of caution to the over-achievers (like me), the process for travel is NOT as clear-cut at it seems (is it ever?). There is a fair amount of paperwork that needs to be filled out precisely and reviewed by other parties. Luckily, Professor Edwards has a lot of patience and experience!
About Me
By trade, I am a Patent Attorney with a tech company in Indianapolis. I graduated from the McKinney School of Law in 2010 and have been practicing in a corporate setting since. My family is heavily involved with the military which has affected me and my interest in the events that have shaped their lives. I also travel extensively and am incredibly fascinated with foreign policy and history. I also am fascinated with how people in other countries in the world view the U.S. This opportunity allows me to help inform people about our country, GTMO, and the ongoing proceedings (or lack thereof) of the detainees. (more…)
Me (Margaret Baumgartner) and one of my favorite members of our armed services.
Who Am I & What Did I Experience at Ft. Meade?
To put a face behind the name, I thought I’d include a picture of myself. That handsome man beside me is my brother, who is part of the reason I’ve become interested in this project. My other brother is still active duty but I want to preserve some of his anonymity since he is deploying again. Thus, I didn’t include a picture of him (I’m not slighting him!!!).
With everything I’ve seen this week, I’ve gone through a wide range of emotions. I wasn’t expecting that to occur. I would walk into the hearing in the morning, feeling that the process in place was a fair one (I do believe in justice) and then I would leave feeling conflicted. Nothing is black and white in this process. For example, I expected the government would be the party slowing the process down to avoid a verdict as they’ve taken this long to bring charges. Instead, it was the defense filing motion after motion and going off on tangents during arguments. I also wasn’t sure what I expected in Mr. Nashiri. From what the contractors said and my observations, he was very respectful (I’ve heard some of the 9-11 defendants are prone to outbursts). There were no outbursts and his responses to questions were polite. I did find it easy to keep an open mind throughout the process and I hope that in my posts, I’ve appeared neutral towards all parties and issues.
I have no career experience with international human rights law or criminal procedure. In fact, with my career, I’ve never seen the inside of a court room (patent cases rarely, if ever, go to trial). The only exposure I have to criminal procedure are the courses I took in law school (IU-McKinney School of Law, J.D. ’10) with Professor William Marsh. Professor Marsh would periodically go down to Guantanamo Bay to advise detainees of their rights. He would come back and detail his experience to us in the classroom. This mostly included a trip down and his clients refusing to see him. My interest was piqued by his chronicles (enough that I took two semesters of Criminal Procedure with him!).
Website Resources
The materials provided on this website have been a valuable resource to me. Having limited knowledge of this area of law, I found myself able to get quickly up to speed. I specifically like having everything in one place to download. We were also provided with binders containing everything on the website. I liked having the motions, conventions, and histories to flip through as I needed reference during the hearings. If I found anything that might have been lacking, it would be biographies or summaries of the parties on the prosecution and the defense.
Another helpful item was a checklist that serves as a guide on what to look for and comment on during our observations. I love lists (I get such joy from checking things off or filling out forms….that’s probably why I’m a patent attorney) and the questions in the list helped acquaint me with the defendant in greater detail. The checklist itself is lengthy and encompasses the entire process. I found myself flipping around to find questions relevant to the pre-trial process, but it was a fantastic resource.
Thoughts on the Process
Did I witness human rights violations? Is the process fair? There is no definitive answer that can be formulated with three observation days and not having access to ALL (including classified) information. I believe that the length of time that Mr. Nashiri has had to wait to have his day in court would not be stood for if this occurred in a U.S. civilian court. There would be all kinds of uproar in the media. Yet, you don’t see headlines drawing attention to this. I also understand that information that is critical to our national security cannot be revealed, but conversely, defense counsel needs to be able to build an informed case. I feel that this lack of information has contributed to the onslaught of motions and arguments (which is in turn slowing the pace). They are trying everything they can to get something to stick given their limited resources.
I’m given the appearance that Mr. Nashiri is being treated with dignity during his detainment. He seemed in good physical health at the trial. He did not appear to be starving or sleep-deprived. He seemed to be accorded his rights to attend proceedings. I was concerned about Mr. Kammen’s comments that they are monitored by video when they meet with Mr. Nashiri. A comment was also made that they thought the room also had audio surveillance. A client has a right to attorney-client privilege and it makes me question if Mr. Nashiri is being given this right. I am satisfied that Mr. Kammen is learned counsel given his experience. He honestly seems to be giving his client his best effort and he appears genuinely concerned for his client.
Closing Thoughts
I highly encourage anyone who is qualified to attend as a representative to apply. This program is a necessity to bring awareness to what is going on in Guantanamo Bay. We need to keep an eye on what happens because it will affect how we are viewed by the rest of the international community. Around D.C., there are signs posted in the metro that say “If you see something, say something”. They are for reporting suspicious activity. I think this phrase is pretty apt here as well. Get the word out.
Quiet morning on at Ft. Meade. Sign in front of the Post Theater, the site of the secure video-link from GTMO
Today was a shortened day. Hearings ran until the lunch recess. The hearing after lunch was to be classified and then they would discuss scheduling for the next couple of months. No more hearings are scheduled for this week.
The Hearings: Appearance
Mr. Nashiri declined to be in attendance today. He was present yesterday and on Monday. The defense went through a procedure to demonstrate that Mr. Nashiri’s absence was voluntary, for the record. This included having the staff judge advocate at Gitmo testify of the process whereby the accused was advised of his commissions for the day, advised of his rights, executed a voluntary waiver, used an interpreter, etc. I think it was well established that Mr. Nashiri chose on his own accord to not attend and it was clear from the evidence presented by both parties that it was a voluntary choice.
The Hearings: Decision on Funding for Defense Contractor
Judge Spath granted the request for 175 more hours of Mr. Assad’s time. From the arguments made yesterday, I feel this is in line with what was presented by both parties (see yesterday’s post for the details and context).
The Hearings: Tu Quoque
Tu Quoque (“you also”, in Latin), or as we sometimes say on the homestead “that’s the pot calling the kettle black”, means “a person is guilty of the very thing of which they accuse another”. This doctrine was argued by the defense in trying to rationalize the alleged (more…)
Today, I made another effort to speak with those in attendance at the Theatre. It wasn’t a large crowd. There was one guy who kept to himself (he left at lunch), the lady who polices the door, the two contractors handling the feed, and the wife of one of the prosecuting attorneys. I spent some time talking to the wife and found her very nice. She will be lonely once the trial begins. The attorneys will not be leaving the base until it is over. She did not give many thoughts on the hearings other than they have been going on a long time.
The Hearings: Death Penalty
Defense filed a motion to compel the procedures on the manner in which the Government intends to put Mr. Nashiri to death if he is found guilty. Judge Spath mentioned that the timing for this motion is a bit early because if the defendant is acquitted, then this becomes moot and there are other pressing matters to attend to.
Recently, there was an execution that took almost 2 hours to complete in Arizona. There is debate as to whether this execution was “botched”, resulting in cruel and unusual punishment. Defense wanted to make sure that Mr. Nashiri would not be put to death in a manner thrown together at the last minute or would be executed in an unreliable method. Defense also wanted to know the proposed location of said execution. Mr. Nashiri cannot be moved to U.S. soil (ruled on in a prior hearing that he cannot be moved to the U.S.) and Gitmo does not have the facilities in place (more…)
It was really easy to get onto base. Make sure that you veer off to the right at the main gate to the vehicle inspection station if you don’t have a DoD sticker. If you mess up and go straight, they are nice and just send you off a quick side ramp to the inspection station. Allow plenty of time for DC traffic if you are coming from town. It was terrible, even at 6 am. There are a couple of Starbucks within a short drive of the main gate off base. I’m a coffee nut and need my java in the mornings, so of course, I would figure out where the locations are.
Logistics: Post Theatre
There is parking at the Post Theatre (the Ft. Meade website said to park at Smallwood Hall and walk over, but it’s a distance in heels). I was an hour early. I had plenty of time to talk with the contractors working the Satellite feed. They are really friendly once they were confident I wasn’t a member of the media out to mis-quote them.
Tidbits from the Contractors
Apparently, the Court Room at GTMO is the most hi-tech in the world. I also learned that Mr. Kammen (defense counsel for al Nashiri) wears a kangaroo pin on his lapel as a protest to the court. A kangaroo court, for those unfamiliar with the term, is “a mock court in (more…)
Selection to attend the hearings for the U.S.S. Cole attacks couldn’t have come at a more fitting time. I just returned from my last in-person visit with my little brother before his deployment. I say little in the fact that he is younger than me, but about twice my size in body mass! He is deploying for Afghanistan with the U.S. Army in a couple of weeks. This will be his second tour of duty in that particular conflict. My other brother has a tour of Afghanistan and a tour of Iraq under his belt (both with the Army as well). I see how these deployments affect my family. My parents have nightmares and are on edge. The worst time was when both were simultaneously deployed to Afghanistan a few years ago. Mom use to have nightmares about my youngest brother’s Black Hawk crashing, him taken prisoner, and she going over to rescue him armed with nothing but a wooden spoon (we tease her about that to this day).
Even though I am a Patent Attorney by trade, I have a great personal interest in matters relating to our country’s military and safety. I also believe in fairness. It is a double edged sword for me, but my legal training has taught me that there are two sides to every story. I believe that those on trial for attacks against our country should be accorded due process and fairness – a chance to be heard. If nothing else, it is because I would want the same for my brothers if they were captured and taken prisoner during their deployments.
I live in the D.C. area, so I have the luxury of not making travel arrangements. I work in-house at a very understanding and flexible company, which allows me to take part in this more freely than most other employers would. I look forward to attending the hearings next week at Fort Meade and to sharing my experience.
The main issue that was argued the last week of January was whether or not a female guard should be permitted to have contact with a detainee. Practical concerns were raised in regards to religion. With Islam, it is taboo to be touched by a female that a man is not related to or married to. Several witnesses were called, including the female guard at issue. Steps were taken to preserve her anonymity and there was no personally identifiable information that was given about her. She testified as to how her job required her to handle the detainee. Arguments were made that went to whether or not allowing females to touch detainees would hinder that females’ advancement in her career, whether or not the defendant’s religious views were being violated, whether or not suitable male replacements could easily be found, etc.
